School is preferable Summary of arguments: In Britain parents are now choosing to educate their children at home. This is often because some children find it difficult to fit into the a school system because they are especially gifted or have problems of some kind.
However, despite the various arguments that have been put forward for home tutoring, this essay will argue that it is better for a child to be educated at school. Teaching children at home has a number of advantages. Firstly, parents feel that their children will be able to realise their potential better if they can work at their own rate and concentrate on specific subjects.
For example, there have been cases of children who have gone to university as young as twelve or thirteen because they especially gifted and have opted out of the school system. Parents feel that they will also be able to protect their children from harmful influences they may encounter at school if they keep them at home. Problems such as truancy and drugs are common and adolescents particularly can be led astray by their peers.
Thus, school can prevent learning to take place effectively. However, there are also arguments in support of sending children to school rather than educating them at home. First of all, children are isolated at home; at school, on the other hand, they are able to socialise and meet people of different ages and so become increasingly independent.
Children also need their peers to do subjects like sports and drama. Another important point is that schools have more resources and equipment than can be provided at home. In addition, school can offer a much wider range of subjects and expertise than parents can provide on their own.
It would be prohibitively expensive for a family to provide the necessary scientific equipment to study physics and chemistry, for instance. It is also clear that parents may not be the best people to teach their children because they would spend too much time together.
In sum, home tuition can affect social independence and create difficulties in drawing boundaries between home and school life. On balance it seems that education at school is preferable to learning at home. It is fair to assume that home education aids concentration and protection, it also limits socialising, availability of resources and professional teaching.
There may be particular cases in which home tutoring would be advantageous, such as for severely disabled children; however, for the vast majority of children there are greater benefits from going to school. I hope you like it. I looked at the unit, and it looks and sounds great. The description says there are 4 topics. Can you tell me the topics before I purchase? Social Networking in School should social media sites be blocked in school? I teach 6th grade English in a single gendered all-girls class.
We just finished an argument piece but I will definitely cycle back your ideas when we revisit argumentation. Thanks for the fabulous resources! I read this and found it helpful but have questions.
First I noticed that amount of time dedicated to the task in terms of days. My questions are how long is a class period? I have my students for about 45 minutes. I also saw you mentioned in the part about self-paced learning that mini-lessons could be written or video format.
I love these ideas. Any thoughts on how to do this with almost no technology in the room and low readers to non-readers? Thank you for any consideration to my questions. Hey Jones, To me, a class period is anywhere from 45 minutes to an hour; definitely varies from school to school. As for the question about doing self-paced with very little tech? I think binders with written mini-lessons could work well, as well as a single computer station or tablet hooked up to a class set of videos.
You might also give students access to the videos through computers in other locations at school like the library and give them passes to watch. The thing about self-paced learning, as you may have seen in the self-paced post , is that if students need extra teacher support as you might find with low readers or non-readers , they would spend more one-on-one time with the teacher, while the higher-level students would be permitted to move more quickly on their own.
My primary goal for next semester is to increase academic discussion and make connections from discussion to writing, so I love how you launch this unit with lessons like Philosophical Chairs.
I am curious, however, what is the benefit of the informal argument before the not-so-informal argument? Or, am I overthinking the management? Thanks so much for input. My 6th graders are progressing through their argumentative essay. Your suggestions will be used.
Students need to feel comfortable knowing that writing is a craft and needs to evolve over time. I think more will get done in class and it is especially important for the struggling writers to have peers and the teacher around while they write. Something that I had students do that they liked was to have them sit in like-topic groups to create a shared document where they curated information that MIGHT be helpful along the way.
By the end of the essay, all will use a fantastic add-on called GradeProof which helps to eliminate most of the basic and silly errors that 6th graders make.
I LOVE the idea of a shared, curated collection of resources! That is absolutely fantastic! Are you using a Google Doc for this? Other curation tools you might consider are Padlet and Elink.
If your school requires more frequent grades, you could assign small point values for getting the incremental steps done: So in Step 3 when students have to write a paragraph stating their point of view you could take points for that.
Another option would be to just give a small, holistic grade for each week based on the overall integrity of their work—are they staying on task? Making small improvements to their writing each day? Taking advantage of the resources? If students are working diligently through the process, that should be enough. Tara, though the more proficient jumper of the two, lacked sophistication in her skating, so many believe Michelle's clean and artistically exquisite program was just as worthy, if not more so, of an Olympic gold medal.
But I think that on the night of the competition, deserved to win. Support your position with sound arguments: In any figure skating competition, winning means giving one's very best in both the short and the free program. Michelle was the odds-on favorite for the ladies' gold, especially after edging out for first place in the short program. Judges stepped into the White Wing arena on February 16 with very high expectations for Michelle.
She demonstrated superior technique and nailed all her elements; but to avoid mistakes, she skated a little too cautiously and slowly. Tara, whom every onlooker expected to wait for her golden moment in , who had been upstaged by Michelle throughout the season, and who had received negative media reviews the preceding three months, skated later, and gave it her all.
Her great speed, her energy, and her two triple-triple combinations, wowed the judges into ranking her performance ahead of Michelle's. By trying her best, she captured the Olympic spirit and the gold.
To accommodate readers with different views, include a counter-argument and refute it: A lot of folks who joined in the debate ended up being split between Michelle's artistry and 's athleticism.
Artistry was nowhere in the judging criteria; presentation was — and that was used to reward technical prowess displayed effortlessly. Six out of nine judges believed presented the program well enough to win.
Restate your position, and if possible, add a new and arresting perspective: I, who was born in , would love to see a Chinese face on top of the podium.
Conclusion restated with a new perspective But let us not get into the debate of who is a better skater, or what it was the skaters did that made them the greatest. Even though your favorite skater will remain the greatest in your eyes, was the best competitor the night she won.
A few more things to note about argumentative writing: You can state your position after you weigh the pros and cons. However, many beginners find it easier to state it in the opening paragraph. You can cite various forms of evidence to support your argument, including anecdotes, statistics and testimonies from authorities Axelrod, To come up with good arguments for your essay, you need to think critically. We cannot help you there—this can be a whole college course in itself.
Avoid strong language that may put off readers with opposing views. Statements like these will keep readers from reading your essays: You should not do it. We need to defeat lust.
Tips and Example how to write argumentative essays in English.
Nov 26, · A few more things to note about argumentative writing: You can state your position after you weigh the pros and cons. However, many beginners find it easier to state it in the opening paragraph.
A Step-by-Step Plan for Teaching Argumentative Writing. February 7, Jennifer Gonzalez. facebook; twitter; Close. I was certified to teach the full spectrum of English language arts—literature, grammar and usage, speech, drama, and so on—but my absolute favorite, the thing I loved doing the most, was teaching students how to write. English argumentative writing All this needs writing english argumentative to nd it. However, such forewarning is a survey instrument, the technology transfer ott.
Writing for Success: Argument. Anonymous. This section will help you determine the purpose and structure of an argumentative essay. The Purpose of Argument in Writing. The word prove is frequently used in the discussion of argumentative writing. Writers may claim that one piece of evidence or another proves the argument, but proving an. Performing Argumentative Writing in English: Difficulties I Processes I and Strategies Wei Zhu Argumentative writing constitutes an important part of second-language.