This law prevents citizens from being able to own certain guns, which is infringing upon the second amendment. The government justifies this by saying that gun control will prove to be beneficial, reducing crime and violence. In reality, gun control fails to solve either of these issues.
An increase in gun control would not solve the issue of violence. Desert News announced that the Brady Campaign issued a point scorecard ranking all the states in The U.
However, Neighborhood Scout listed the thirty cities with the highest homicide rates of and named East ST. Illinois had strict gun control laws for six years yet the state still had plenty of violence and crime. This directly shows that gun control does not resolve any violence or crime issues. A criminal, by definition, is a person who has committed a crime.
Since these criminals have already proven themselves to be those who break the law, more laws would likely not prevent crime. Additionally, guns are not the actual problem that needs to be addressed. In a patient Devin Kelley escaped from a mental hospital in New Mexico. In this case, and numerous others, the human is not mentally stable, making them the threat, not the gun. There is a bigger issue at hand- mental health issues- that the government is failing to solve with gun control.
This shooting in Texas occurred after an unstable patient escaped from a mental hospital; perhaps what the government needs to impose is stricter mental health regulations such as higher security at mental hospitals or better mental health awareness.
Gun control infracts upon the freedom to own guns for hunting and sport. However, the government continues to keep adding gun laws, making it harder and harder for even a regular person to purchase a gun. When the second amendment was written there was no gun control at all, but over time the U. This gun control law directly impacts high school students as it makes it very difficult, and in some cases impossible, for high schools to have a trap team.
Since this law will not allow schools to hold practices on campus, schools are either forced to find somewhere else to practice or not offer a trap team. Many schools do not even have access to another location to hold trap team practices, and therefore students do not have a trap team to join. Many people seem to think that banning guns will result in significantly reduced violence. However, the ban of guns will fail to solve violence problems as criminals already, and will continue to, obtain guns illegally.
The California Firearms Laws Summary states that any person convicted of a felony has a lifetime prohibition from owning a firearm Penal Code Section Criminals clearly disregard laws, so even though it is illegal for a felon to own a firearm, felons still obtain and use guns illegally. Just because there is more gun laws does not mean criminals will follow them, therefore more gun control will not solve violence issues.
In summary, gun control infringes upon the second amendment, fails to solve violence issues, and violates U. All American citizens are born with unalienable rights that cannot be taken away. With gun control, it should not pose any problem. You do have to avoid any emotional language, but you still need to have your own argument on the issue. Given the controversial nature of the topic, this should also pose no problem: The next thing you do is collect evidence to support your argument.
This may include collecting evidence in support of the opposing argument for you to rebuke. There is a lot of material on both sides of the argument, so even an extensive research for your gun control argumentative essay should not be too challenging.
Once you have conducted your research, it is time to start writing. Just as any other essay, an argumentative essay on gun control comprises of three parts: In the introducing paragraph, you present your topic to the reader by giving some relevant background information and stating your standpoint on the issue in your thesis statement. The main body of your essay will consist of three parts: In the conclusion of your gun control argumentative essay, you briefly re-state your standpoint and why it is the right one.
Persuasive essays are largely similar to argumentative ones, so much that it may be difficult to pinpoint the difference at first. This difference mainly lies in the ways by which you prove the rightness of your claim. Let us take a closer look at these ways.
The commonly accepted classification suggests three main methods of persuasion: Logos employs logic to appeal to the reader's rationality. Pathos uses the irrational and appeals to emotion. Ethos employs authority and appeals to the sense of ethics. As we have mentioned, an argumentative essay focuses on proving the rightness of your argument rationally - so, it employs logos as the only method of persuasion.
In a persuasive essay, on the other hand, you focus on your result - persuading your reader. Thus, you can employ whichever of the three methods of persuasion you like in any combination. When we talk specifically about gun control, it is a heavily emotional topic, so it is hard to stick to dry facts and logic exclusively. So, when writing a gun control persuasive essay, not only logical but also ethical and emotional appeal is probably much easier than writing an argumentative essay and sticking to logic.
Consequentially, an argumentative essay suggests that you use neutral language at all times, whereas in a persuasive essay you can relax and write in moderately emotional language here and there. The writing and pre-writing processes for a persuasive essay will not be different from those for an argumentative one: As we have discussed, gun control is an extremely broad and multi-angled topic.
Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or even bigger academic papers.
If you choose to write a research paper on gun control, however, you will still find that the topic is too broad and you will have to narrow it down according to your personal and academic interest. Still, if you find a particular gun control-related topic interesting, it is not enough to make a good topic for a research paper. It also has to be original, i. On the bright side, you usually will not have to pick a fixed topic and stick to it.
At the initial stage of your work, you can formulate your subject somewhat vaguely and specify and adjust the topic to your liking with the course of your research. Another distinct feature of a research paper is that it needs a presentable list of referenced sources. You do not have to stick to other authors' writing here.
You are also allowed often even encouraged to get and use your own empirical findings. One final thing that you need to know about a research paper is that it needs to focus on the research data - facts and analytics, rather than opinions and reflections - your own or those of other authors. Gun control is one of those topics that encourage us to be biased and express opinions. Hence, there are lots of opinions on gun control out there - both pro and anti, - and most probably, you have one as well.
However, when you are writing an academic paper, you cannot make your writing strictly opinion-based. Regardless of what kind of assignment you are writing, everything you write there has to refer to hard evidence. In other words, any kind of paper on gun control demands profound research. You need to be well informed about the background of the issue and both sides of the argument.
As you know, the very issue of individual firearm possession and its control date back to the late 18 th century and the famous Second Amendment. So, this is where you begin your research you should be familiar with the text of the Second Amendment. Given the amount of time that has passed since then, the understanding of the Second Amendment has evolved, which is marked by a number of notable court cases, about which you also need to be aware.
The most significant of them include United States v. Cruikshank , the United States v. Miller , District of Columbia v. Heller , McDonald v. The City of Chicago , and others. However, being familiar with the background of the issue will only make your own opinion more reasoned, and this is not enough to put together an academic paper. You will also need be familiar with the current line of thought in both pro and anti gun control directions.
To do that, you should read the gun control articles and watch the documentaries on the issue from reputable news sources, such as Businessweek, New Yorker, Times, CNN, and others.
Anti gun control articles are written by experts who are convinced that individual firearm possession should not be controlled more than it already is or should not be controlled at all. You can begin your research by looking through these articles:. DePhilippis and Hughes have co-founded the site Armed With Reason to inform people about gun violence prevention. The article centers around the idea that introducing more strict gun control regulations does not decrease gun violence because criminals procure firearms illegally anyway.
Wilson is an author of several books on crime and teaches at Pepperdine University. The article blames the gun control lobby of populism and points out that they have no suggestions as to what to do with the existing amount of guns owned by individuals: Hardy is an attorney from Arizona.
He claims that as an anti gun control person, he is open to dialogue with the opponent side, which he cannot say about them. He claims that they are like fanatics on a crusade who will not stop until all individual firearm possession is banned. Taya Kyle is the widow of the late Chris Kyle whose story was the basis for the movie American Sniper.
She wrote this emotional and insightful piece to express her views on the issue. If you want to read more about it, she also has written a book American Wife: Davidson interviews James Jacobs, the director of the Center for Research in Crime and Justice at New York University School of Law, to pinpoint the definition of gun control as exactly as possible and to question the most popular approaches to gun control.
In this article, Davidson clarifies what gun control actually is and puts to question various popularly suggested gun control methods. Hunter serves as an aide to the conservative Senator Rand Paul.
In his article, he claims that gun control lobbyists only notice the cases where mass shootings occur while ignoring the instances where well-intended gun-owning citizens have prevented crime and violence. He also lists some inspiring stories of the latter instances.
Pro gun control articles are written by people who are not enthusiastic about the current gun control policy and suggest that either it should be more strict, or individual firearm possession should be downright outlawed. Here are some of the most interesting examples:. Gun Control and the Constitution:
Essay against Gun Control Gun control has been a hot topic for very long time. People on the anti-gun control side believe that gun ownership is a Constitutional right backed by the Second Amendment.
Final Paper: Argument Against Gun Control. The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns.
An Argument Against Gun Control Essay Words | 8 Pages. The Gun Control issue has sparked major controversy in America today. People who support gun control feel that guns are the reason for the soaring crime rate in our country. Persuasive gun control essay. A Criminologist's Case Against Gun Control by Jacob Davidson, Time. Davidson interviews James Jacobs, the director of the Center for Research in Crime and Justice at New York University School of Law, to pinpoint the definition of gun control as exactly as possible and to question the most popular .
Against Gun Control Essay The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. 50% of the population are for it explaining that having a gun provides them some protection. Because of various reasons our justice system cannot always protect us which is why the majority of people is looking for some other ways of. Hailey, your essay is well written and concise. The points you make are direct and well thought out. My only critique would be that you left out that by passing gun control, the Government deprives its citizens their right to defend themselves.