They usually portray it as a case of individual liberty. One source states "euthanasia, if legalized, would be the ultimate civil liberty, since it would secure the freedom to determine and to control our own death. The physician should follow the demands of the patient, even if it means killing them, because that would respect their wishes and the rights of the patient. Physicians treat patients with the purpose of restoring health.
If the patient can't be restored to a reasonable level of living, it shouldn't be wrong to discontinue it. Euthanasia supporters often try to get sympathy by relating stories to make one feel like suicide is the only option in their case. The media has sparked a lot of interest, and continues to show stories like this.
Simi Linton, psychologist, says, "I'm disturbed at how the media treats it, as: It makes it seem as if would be inhumane to deny anyone this option. Basically, it is the quality of life that is the main concern of the patient. They may feel that life is not worth living in their state. It would not be humane to insist that every means be taken to keep someone alive. A physician's main concern is to relieve suffering, so sometimes there is only one way to achieve that goal. At the time that efforts are no longer doing any good, the main concern is to make the patient comfortable and alleviate symptoms such as pain.
Drugs do not always get rid of all the pain, especially when it is excruciating. Sometimes a patient will be drugged into unconscious with severe pain that cannot be controlled. This does not seem like effective pain management to me. I do not believe people will be satisfied living in such a state as that.
They would want to be put out of their misery. Legalization would cause many changes. It would give rights to the person who does it, rather than the person who dies. It is about the right to kill, rather than the right to die. They will need to gain expertise in understanding patients' motivations for requesting it, assessing their mental status, diagnosing and treating depression.
The medical profession is developing greater expertise in managing terminal illness but would need to develop similar expertise in responding to requests for physician-assisted suicide.
The debates over assisted suicide have forced clinicians to be more aware of what can be done to relieve suffering. Doctors are improving palliative care and their own behavior. Patients are becoming more aware of their options. The problems associated with legalizing assisted suicide are usually not talked about when the proponents make their argument. The discussion of the potential for abuse, the ways it could be prevented or better helped are put on a backburner.
The main argument against legalization is that human life is sacred, and it is not a human right to take it away. Some say that there is no need for suicide, because health care should resolve all problems and pain management has come a long way. Most people who commit suicide suffer from depression, so it is often debated whether this could be the reason for someone wanting assisted suicide. Often, when their depression is treated, the patient responds well, and would like to live.
A regular physician cannot make the determination of whether a patient is suffering from depression. This is something that is difficult to diagnose in terminally ill patients. Just because a patient request suicide does not mean this will be an appropriate solution. Sometimes, a patient may even request suicide, but when the time draws near, they change their mind because it did not seem so imminent before.
The will to request the suicide must be voluntary, but this decision is left up to the physician. How can a physician judge whether it is voluntary or not? It is also difficult to determine what terminal is. When people say that it should be reserved for people who are terminally ill, they cannot define it.
It is used to mean someone whose death will occur in a relatively short time. Some people may say that if they will die in 6 months it is considered terminal, but it is difficult to determine exactly how long someone has to live. They may live much longer than that.
A person could also be terminal who is in a vegitative state, but will live for years in that state with continued medicine. People cannot reach an agreement on what the definition of terminal would be, some even say old age is terminal.
Activists of euthanasia use the demonstration that suicide is the only means to control unbearable pain. Most pain is supposed to be able to be eliminated, or greatly reduced. Many people do not get enough pain control. Also, too much pain medication can cause symptoms that may be worse than the disease was itself. One source says that "patients and physicians alike may be unaware of the options available in the medical system, including advances in pain control that could help patients but are not routinely provided.
There may be no solution to these problems, but some things can be done. Better health care education, more access to health care, and informing patients of their rights. Patients should get adequate health care, and not killed. Physicians argue that if good care of the dying is being provided, then a request for suicide would be rare. Some patients may want to consider suicide, but are incapable of administering medicine.
Some people may also lose their mental capabilities, and will be unable to request it. It is difficult to assess fairness in cases like these. Some people use a form of advance directive and make their request before deterioration occurs. It is hard to extend the same rights to all patients without causing abuse. If someone is unable to communicate their request, it would be frightening for someone to make that decision for them and to say that their life is not worth living, so we must kill them.
There is great potential for abuse if it were to be legalized. Depressed people, elderly, and very frightened people would be greatly affected. People may feel pressured into giving up. Elderly are especially vulnerable to this. Now that there are more people living longer, this problem will increase.
They may tend to feel they are a burden on their families, or are selfishly consuming resources. If a physician advocates it, they also may be swayed. People may also feel distrustful of the physician's advice. This may cause a hardship in getting appropriate care. Legalization will only encourage more people to take part in it. It does not seem as if we would be ready for this to occur, because we are only just beginning to explore some realms of the medical world.
It took a long time to figure out about adequate care for many patients and when is the right time to withdraw life support, so it would not seem that we would be ready for this step. The "slippery slope" argument is used by opponents, saying that legalization will lead to involuntary euthanasia. My own opinion is that if assisted suicide were legalized, we may not be as inclined to advance medical progress and knowlege.
They may not use their experience to increase what we know about medicine and learn how to help the illness, or better cope with it. Proponents have said that euthanasia should be considered "medical treatment. Then it may be more likely to be administered to people who cannot make the request. Some decisions that have gone to court say that assisted suicide is a constitutional right and that someone else can make the decision for the patient. It seems to be inevitable that patient are going to be killed without permission if legalization occurs, even with rules about consent.
The main argument of how abuse of the practice could occur is called the "slippery slope argument. This issue echoes their values and beliefs as a commonality. In the same time it calls for a clear and precise response as. The environment for the proposed study will be a Department of Veterans Affairs VA medical center hereinafter alternatively "VAMC" that provides the full complement of tertiary healthcare services.
Description of environment and rationale for. Brittany Maynard Case The case of Brittany Maynard is a fairly textbook one when it comes to the discussions that center on doctor-assisted suicide and euthanasia in general. There are indeed cases where the death of a patient is a certainty. However, the devil is in the details as some people believe that they have to suffer out their final days while others, such as Brittany Maynard, feel that they should.
Ethical Dilemma- Euthanasia Meaning Euthanasia-literally meaning 'Eu' good, 'thanatos' death or assisted suicide has existed since long in human history.
The current discussions arise out of improved medical claims about alleviating pain, changed societal norms, and 'open' religious thoughts. Still want to consult or post content on NewsActivist? Just close this window! The topic of this paper is assisted suicide and euthanasia in Canada. This paper will mainly be analytical , as it will be looking at the causes of this issue and its consequences on the general population.
Finally, this paper will seek to answer why there is a lack of resources for human euthanasia and assisted suicide in this country. Assisted suicide and euthanasia are social issues because they show a gap between social ideals every human being has the right to live with an adequate quality of life and the social reality patients with degenerative diseases cannot end their sufferance with consent due to the lack of resources for euthanasia and assisted suicide in Canada.
Only recently, precisely in February , the right to practice assisted suicide in this country has been partially legalized for adult patients who clearly understand and fully consent to the end of life Duffy, As it is right now in , a brand new law called the Dying with Dignity law has been put into place to legalize the practice of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Canada Plante.
However, a doctor who receives the request to help a person die must confirm with second doctor in order to proceed to euthanasia, the second doctor may refuse to help the patient in some circumstances Plante.
The lack of resources for assisted suicide still affect a significant part of the population since its practice is prohibited to all patients who do not meet the strict governmental requirements i. This issue can be assed through legislative reforms and further psychiatric research on understanding death Duffy, However, this issue can also be looked at from the community level, looking at changes physician-assisted suicide has on the legal system and in the medical industry.
Physician Assisted Suicide, Is it Right or Wrong SOC May 9, Physician Assisted Suicide, Is it Right or Wrong? The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are both emotional and controversial, as it ranks right up there with abortion.
Assisted Suicide Research Paper October 24, writer Research Papers 0 Euthanasia is one of the solutions for people suffering from various incurable diseases and sicknesses that are too painful for them to handle.
In conclusion, assisted suicide in its controversies has over the time been done for what humans believe is for the good of the person. Some unbearable medical conditions have prompted medical practitioners to carry out assisted suicide. Physician Assisted Suicide research papers discuss the ethical problems that occur with the issue of physician assisted suicide. Euthanasia and Medical Ethics research papers examine how the AMA views physician assisted suicide. Order a research paper on Euthanasia from Paper Masters.
- Physician assisted suicide Physician assisted suicide, a suicide made possible by a physician providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, and euthanasia, the . Assisted Suicide Research Paper This sample Assisted Suicide Research Paper is published for educational and informational purposes only. Free research papers are not written by our writers, they are contributed by users, so we are not responsible for the content of this free sample paper.